61+ Inspiring Quotes from “The Little Book of Common Sense Investing”

Common sense plays an important role in investing. A winner’s goal is to own a diversified portfolio and hold it for a long time. Having a complete about index investing is important and, taking the guidance of John C. Bogle’s book, “The Little Book of Common-Sense Investing”, will help you.

some of the great Quotes From “The Little Book Of Common Sense Investing”

For those in the company, persuading their clientele to “don’t just stand there” is the key to success. “Do something”.

In the aggregate, however, the path to riches for their clients is to follow the inverse maxim: “Don’t do anything.” Take a position.” Because that is the only way to avoid losing money by trying to beat the market.

Owning businesses and collecting the immense advantages afforded by the dividends and earnings growth of our country’s—and, for that matter, the world’s— corporations is the key to successful investing.

The higher their investment activity, the higher the cost of financial intermediation and taxes. The lower the net return received by shareholders—as a group, the owners of our firms.

In the long run, stock returns are almost entirely determined by the reality of our corporations’ investment returns. The perception of investors, as reflected in speculative returns, is of little importance.

The track record shows that investing in American companies through a broadly diversified index fund is logical and extremely productive.

Costs determine whether an investment succeeds or fails. Sharpen your pencils. Do your arithmetic. Recognize that you are not obligated to play the hyperactive management game that most individual investors and mutual fund owners do.

A comparable association occurs, even though few independent comparisons take into account the increased cost of fund portfolio change. 

For all equity funds as a group, funds in the lowest-turnover quartile have consistently outperformed those in the highest-turnover quartile in each of the nine style boxes.

There is a significant difference between actively managed funds and equivalent index funds. In 2016, expenditures on a comparable value index fund consumed 2% of fund income, whereas expenses on a low-cost growth index fund consumed only 4%.

Whatever the precise facts, the evidence is overwhelming that equity fund long-term returns lag the stock market by a significant amount, which is mostly accounted for by their costs.

Fund investors’ returns behind the market by more than double that sizable lag.

The typical actively managed equities fund today has a portfolio turnover of 78 per cent each year, including buying and sales. (The “conventional” turnover rate is 39 per cent, which includes only the lesser of purchases or sales.)

Bonds are even easier to develop realistic expectations for future returns than stocks. 

Why? Because, unlike stock returns, which have three sources, bond returns have a single dominant source: the interest rate at the time the bonds are purchased.

Bond returns, like stock returns, are expected to fall considerably short of historical norms over the next decade.

High-cost actively managed funds look to be an awful choice for investors until the fund industry begins to change—by dramatically cutting management fees, operating expenditures, sales charges, and portfolio turnover.

Choose a low-cost index fund that invests in the stock market.

Choose funds with low fees, low portfolio turnover, and no sales commissions.

Choose successful funds based on their long-term track histories.

Choose the best funds based on their recent short-term success.

Seek professional help when choosing funds that are likely to outperform the market.

The basic fact is that choosing a mutual fund that would outperform the stock market over time is like “searching for a needle in a haystack,” as Cervantes put it. 

Here’s a word of caution: “Don’t look for the needle in the haystack.” Purchase the haystack!”

There is just no systematic approach to ensure success by selecting funds that will outperform the market, even when looking at their long-term performance.

It’s like looking for a needle in a haystack, and the chances of finding one are slim to none.

Reversion to the mean (RTM) is alive and well in the mutual fund industry, with funds whose records significantly outperform industry norms tending to return to the average or below.

The weighted average return on equity funds held by investors who used advisers was only 2.9 per cent per year, compared to 6.6 per cent earned by investors who handled their affairs.

I’m not suggesting that you reduce your equity allocation if you switch from high-cost actively managed funds to low-cost index funds. 

However, if you have actively managed stock and bond funds in your asset allocation, with fees far higher than low-cost index funds, you should think about what is likely to produce the best net return. Do the simple math.

If the original TIF was intended with long-term investment in mind, employing index funds as trading vehicles can only be defined as short-term speculation.

There’s nothing wrong with investing in broad-market indexed exchange-traded funds (ETFs), as long as you don’t trade them.

The largest TIF managers are engaged in a fiercely competitive pricing war, slashing their expense rates to attract the assets of investors who understand the importance of costs.

Put your fantasies aside, grab your common sense, and stick to the tried-and-true strategy represented by the standard index fund.

We understand that we must begin investing as soon as feasible and continue to do so on a regular basis thereafter.

We all know that investing implies some level of risk. But we also understand that failing to invest will lead to financial ruin.

We understand the sources of returns in the stock and bond markets, which is the first step toward knowledge.

Our objective remains the same: earning a fair share of whatever returns our businesses are willing to deliver in the years ahead.

Similar Posts:

Was this article helpful?